Residential Home Sales Market Statistics: A Comparison of Normal Sales versus Short Sales and Foreclosures in August 2009

Middle Tennessee Residential Property Foreclosure Activity Report
Residential Real Estate Market Sales Activity - Foreclosures, Pre-foreclosures and Short Sales Compared to Regular Listings
Counties & Cities/Towns Covered:
Rutherford County Tennessee: Murfreesboro TN, Smyrna TN and La Vergne TN (LaVergne TN)
Williamson County Tennessee: Brentwood TN and Franklin TN
Month & Year	August 2009
Start Date	8/1/2009
End Date	8/31/2009
City/Town	Active Listings - Total	Active Listings - % Foreclosures & Short Sales	Pending Sales - % Foreclosures & Short Sales	Months of Residential Inventory Based on Pending Sales Rate
Murfreesboro	1,322	8.25%	13.22%	5.46
Smyrna	389	13.11%	18.33%	6.48
La Vergne	291	20.27%	47.54%	4.77
Brentwood	645	3.41%	5.56%	11.94
Franklin	1,127	2.75%	3.03%	11.38
Totals & Averages	3,774	7.21%	15.12%	7.31
Notes:
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of Pending Sales that are distress sales (Foreclosures and Short Sales) is greater than their representation as a percentage of Active Listings.  This means that these distressed listings are Pending (i.e. selling) at a faster rate then regular listings.

Middle Tennessee - Rutherford County TN - Residential Home Sales Market Statistics: A Comparison of Normal Sales versus Short Sales and Foreclosures in August 2009

According to the data I researched in the Middle Tennessee MLS (RealTracs) as of 9/1/2009, the following Market Statistics paint a troubling picture for the 3 main cities/towns in Rutherford County Tennessee:

Active Listings

• Murfreesboro TN -109 out of 1,322 Active Listings (or 8.25%) are shown as Short Sale or Foreclosure listings.
• Smyrna TN - 51 out of 389 Active Listings (or 13.11%) are shown as Short Sale or Foreclosure listings.
• LaVergne (or La Vergne) TN - 59 out of 291 Active Listings (or 20.27%) are shown as Short Sale or Foreclosure listings.

Pending Sales

• Murfreesboro TN -32 out of 242 Pending Sales (or 13.22%) are shown as Short Sale or Foreclosure listings.
• Smyrna TN - 11 out of 60 Pending Sales (or 18.33%) are shown as Short Sale or Foreclosure listings.
• LaVergne (or La Vergne) TN - 29 out of 61 Pending Sales (or 47.54%) are shown as Short Sale or Foreclosure listings.

As you can see in all the towns above the % of Short Sales and Foreclosures is high for both Active Listings and Pending Sales. However, the worst part is that when looked at as a percentage of Pending Sales the Short Sale and Foreclosure share of Pending Sales is relatively high when compared to percentage of Active Listings to the tune of 50%+. This means that regular (i.e. non Short Sale and Foreclosure) listings will have a difficult time selling as a large share of Pending Sales are lower priced distressed properties.

For Murfreesboro and Smyrna the % of Pending Sales that are Foreclosures and Short Sales remained about the same as last month, but for La Vergne the % increased from 34% to 47.54%. While the real estate markets in Murfreesboro TN and Smyrna TN are definitely hurting and prices are declining, the La Vergne real estate market is in really bad shape.

Middle Tennessee - Rutherford County TN - Residential Home Sales Market Statistics: A Comparison of Normal Sales versus Short Sales and Foreclosures in July 2009

According to the data I researched in the Middle Tennessee MLS (RealTracs) as of 7/29/2009, the following Market Statistics paint a troubling picture for the 3 main cities/towns in Rutherford County Tennessee:

Active Listings

• Murfreesboro TN -110 out of 1,324 Active Listings (or 8.31%) are shown as Short Sale or Foreclosure listings.
  
• Smyrna TN - 50 out of 406 Active Listings (or 12.32%) are shown as Short Sale or Foreclosure listings.
• LaVergne (or La Vergne) TN - 61 out of 297 Active Listings (or 20.54%) are shown as Short Sale or Foreclosure listings.

Pending Sales

• Murfreesboro TN -31 out of 231 Pending Sales (or 13.42%) are shown as Short Sale or Foreclosure listings.
  
• Smyrna TN - 10 out of 52 Pending Sales (or 19.23%) are shown as Short Sale or Foreclosure listings.
• LaVergne (or La Vergne) TN - 17 out of 50 Pending Sales (or 34.00%) are shown as Short Sale or Foreclosure listings.

As you can see in all the towns above the % of Short Sales and Foreclosures is high for both Active Listings and Pending Sales. However, the worst part is that when looked at as a percentage of Pending Sales the Short Sale and Foreclosure share of Pending Sales is relatively high when compared to percentage of Active Listings to the tune of 50%+. This means that regular (i.e. non Short Sale and Foreclosure) listings will have a difficult time selling as a large share of Pending Sales are lower priced distressed properties.

When "Good News" Is Really Bad News

According to this RISMedia article, Single-Family Starts and Permits Edge Higher in April, the number of new home starts increased by 2.8% to a seasonally adjusted rate of 368,000 units and the the number of permits for future construction also increased. The article mentions that low mortgage rates, low prices, the federal $8,000 tax credit and additional state specific tax credits were partially responsible for the boost.

I will tell you right now that this is the terrible news. Overbuilding spurred by easy to get loans was a major contributor to the current real estate mess. We do not need more new homes being built, especially if they are fuled by artifically low rates, which will eventually increase significantly, and tax credits. Only rookie buyers or truly marginal buyers would make the decision to buy a home based on a measy $8,000 to $15,000 in tax credits, especially given the fact that taxes are going to increase in order to pay for the "stimulus plan". Therefore, these buyers will have less money than they think after their tax credit is factored in. I predict that these buyers will have a high foreclosure rate and the overall foreclosure rate will contnue to be high. All of this will continue to depress prices in the very areas that were most affected by the real estate decline.

Birmingham Auction Ended Abruptly After Too Many "Low Bids"

According this article in The Birmingham News, City Federal auction ends abruptly due to low bids, the auction was originally scheduled to sell off 20 condo units, but was stopped after only 11 sold due to what the condo project owners, Synergy Realty Services LLC, called "low bids". Condos that once were listed for $239,000 to $935,000 ended up selling for only $80,000 to $320,000. The project owners said they were disappointed by the low prices, but would try to re-market the remaining condos at pre-auction prices.

My opinion is that these people are fools. There is no other market for these condos. $935,000 for a condo in Birmingham? Sorry, it makes no sense. That market is long gone and never coming back. It was a sham built upon a mountain of debt that is no longer available. The condo project owners should liquidate for whatever they can get as it is only going to get worse.

Bloomberg.com Article: U.S. Existing Home Sales, Prices Slumped in January

According to this Bloomberg.com article U.S. Existing Home Sales, Prices Slumped in January.

The gist ofthe article is that the declining economy is going to going to continue to drag down the housing market as consumer confidence also declines.

According to the article the economy will likley not rebound with respect to unemployment until 2011.

The article quotes Lawrence Yun, the chief economist for the National Association of REALTORS (NAR), as saying that the recent goverment actions may lift home resales by as much as 900,000 units this year.

Being a REALTOR myself, I have read Mr. Yun's predictions many times over the past 3 years. 

I have to say that he has said the market would improve in 2006, 2007 and 2008.

Each time he was wrong and he will be wrong this time as well. Despite what NAR would like

consumers to believe, homes are still not affordbale. NAR's way determining home affordability is

to factor in financing (see the NAR Home Affordability Index). The problem is that when financing

is abnormally cheap (i.e. like during the market boom) it lends itself to over-inflated prices (like during the market boom).

The result is that when rates increase the home owners cannot sell their home for as much as they paid and a whole

new problem starts just like what we see now. The fact is that prior to the huge run up in home prices that started

around 2000, the median home price in a given area was more related to the median income in that area.

For homeowners to be financially solvent the ration of home prices to median income needs to be around 2 to 1

with an absolute maximum of 3 to 1. Now even after the market declines that started in 2006

the median price of a home in most areas of the US is 3-4 times the median household income

meaning that 2 people now need to work to buy a home as opposed to just one worker in each

household. Two family incomes helped push up the median price and this was worsened by

consumers accepting more debt as being OK. Historically, the values of real estate were

determined by the quality of life that the location offered, the size and type of property and

local employment prospects. Unfortunately, during the most recent run up in prices the major

factor was the monthly housing payment versus household income. As rates went lower and

financing became more available, prices increased until the prices reached a popping point.

That cannot happen again, otherwise, we will see the same problems all over again. The solution

is that real estate prices need to continue to decline for a while longer in order to bring affordability

more in line with common sense criteria, not monthly housing payments.